85
GeoVax Clade B DNA/MVA HIV/AIDS Vaccine Is Well Tolerated and Immunogenic when Administered to Healthy Seronegative Adults (HVTN 065 part A)
Harriet Robinson*1, P Goepfert2, C Hay3, S Frey4, W Blattner5, P Wright6, M Elizaga7, L Qin7, B Moss8, and HVTN 065 Protocal Team
1GeoVax Inc, Atlanta, GA, US; 2Univ of Alabama at Birmingham, US; 3Univ of Rochester, NY, US; 4St Louis Univ, MO, US; 5Inst of Human Virology, Univ of Maryland, Baltimore, US; 6Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN, US; 7Fred Hutchinson Cancer Res Ctr, Seattle, WA, US; and 8NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, US
Background: Here we report on the safety and
immunogenicity of a preventative vaccine that consists of DNA priming and modified
vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) boosting (DNA/MVA vaccine). Both DNA and MVA
components of the vaccine are single immunogens that express clade B Gag, Pol,
and Env in virus like particles. Simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) and
simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) prototypes for the vaccine have provided
protection against disease in SHIV and SIV non-human primate challenge models.
Methods: In this ongoing, prospective, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled dose-escalation study, volunteers were vaccinated intramuscularly
at months 0 and 2 with JS7 DNA and boosted at months 4 and 6 with MVA62. A low-dose
group (10 vaccine recipients and 2 placebos) received 0.3 mg of DNA and 107
TCID50 of MVA. The high-dose group (30 vaccine recipients and 6
placebos) received 3 mg of DNA and 108 TCID50 of MVA. Volunteers
were evaluated for safety throughout the study. Intracellular cytokine staining
for responding T cells and Gag enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were performed
by the HVTN Laboratory Program. The Env ELISA was performed at Emory.
Results: Both the low and high doses of the vaccine
were well tolerated. Injection site pain or tenderness was either not present (33.3%)
or rated as mild (50%) or moderate (16.6%). No systemic symptoms were noted in 45.8%
of volunteers and the remainder had either mild (31.2%) or moderate (22.9%)
symptoms. Side effects and tolerability were not significantly different
between the low- and high-dose groups. Overall, T cell responses were similar
in the low- and high-dose group. For the high-dose group, 75% of the volunteers
had responding CD4 T cells and 37% had responding CD8 T cells. The median
magnitudes of positive responses were 0.11% of total CD4 T cells and 0.15% of
total CD8 T cells. For the high dose, 82% of the CD4 responders and 67% of the
CD8 responders had interleukin (IL) -2 and interferon (IFN) -γ
co-producing cells at the peak response. Anti-Gag and anti-Env antibody
responses were more frequently seen in the high- than the low-dose group. Of
the volunteers, 88% exhibited binding antibody for Env in the high-dose group;
but only 22% in the low-dose group. The second MVA increased the CD8 and antibody
responses, but not the CD4 responses.
Conclusions: The majority of vaccinated participants
demonstrated cellular responses at both low and high doses to this
well-tolerated DNA/MVA vaccine regimen. Testing of the vaccines in additional
volunteers with 3-injection regimens using a single DNA prime, or MVA-only; and
planning for a phase II trial are underway.
|