298 
Use of a Dually Inducible Cell Line Reveals Distinct Patterns of CD4 and CCR5 Usage among Laboratory and Primary HIV-1 and SIV Strains
Samantha Johnston*1, M Lobritz2, S Nguyen1, C Garibay1, B Ank1, Y Bryson1, E Arts2, T Chou1, and B Lee1
1Univ of California, Los Angeles, US and 2Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH, US
Background: HIV-1 entry is mediated by CD4 and one of two
co-receptors, CCR5 or CXCR4. The ability of an HIV-1 strain to use differing
levels of CD4/CCR5 reflects its affinity for CD4 and co-receptor, and is one
factor associated with the overall viral infectivity and pathogenicity. We have
designed a system to quantitatively describe the efficiency of CD4/CCR5 usage,
and used it to examine SIV, HIV-1 strains, and primary isolates from infants
with rapid- and slow-progressing (RP vs SP) disease.
Methods: An inducible cell line was created where CD4
and CCR5 expression can be simultaneously and independently controlled with
tetracycline and ponasteroneA, respectively. CD4 and CCR5 levels can be induced
and controlled within the range of expression found on primary cell targets of
HIV-1. Infection was quantified by intracellular p24 staining, or GFP/luciferase
activity when using pseudotyped reporter viruses.
Results: Infection of the cells with SIV-316
pseudotyped virus showed dependence on CCR5 but not CD4 concentration,
consistent with the known CD4 independence of the virus. Infection with R5
viruses, Bal or YU2, increased with increasing concentrations of both CD4 and
CCR5. Infection with 89.6 showed marked dependence on CD4 levels, regardless of
the amount of CCR5 present. Infection with primary Clade B and A strains with
previously defined high and low affinity for CCR5 and CD4, showed that each
virus generates a distinct 3-D surface curve that represents their efficiency
of CD4 and CCR5 usage. Mathematical modeling provided a scalar metric that
clusters each isolate distinctly on a polar plot, and quantitatively describes
their CD4/CCR5 usage pattern. Finally,
at maximal CD4/CCR5 induction, infection with isolates from 3 RP and 4 SP
resulted in a significantly higher percentage of infected cells from the RP
isolates (0.38-9.1 % vs 12.11-18.99 % p24+ cells for SP vs RP
isolates, respectively; p<0.01).
Conclusions: Various SIV and HIV-1 strains exhibit
different patterns of CD4 and CCR5 usage, as shown by distinct 3-D surface
curves, which can be clustered distinctly in a scalar polar plot. Also, viruses from RP are more efficient in using CD4 and CCR5 than those from SP.
This assay can directly quantify CD4/CCR5 usage by primary HIV isolates, and
can be used to study the correlation between CD4/CCR5 usage and viral
pathogenicity, and potentially, to monitor the changes in CD4/CCR5 affinity
that may occur with the clinical use of CCR5 inhibitors.
|