Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 106 Poster Abstracts
Resistance Associated with ART for PMTCT
Session Day and Time: Monday, 1-4 pm
Room: Hall A


635b    
Analysis of NVP Resistance in Ugandan Infants Who Were HIV-infected despite Receiving Single-dose Nevirapine vs Single-dose NVP Plus up to 6 Weeks of Daily NVP to Prevent HIV Vertical Transmission
Jessica Church*1, S Omer2, L Guay1, W Huang3, P Musoke4, F Mmiro5, J Jackson1, and S Eshleman1
1Johns Hopkins Univ Sch of Med, Baltimore, MD, US; 2Johns Hopkins Univ Bloomberg Sch of Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD, US; 3Monogram Biosci, South San Francisco, CA, US; 4Makerere Univ, Kampala, Uganda; and 5Makerere Univ Johns Hopkins Univ Res Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda

Background:  The SWEN Study in Uganda, Ethiopia, and India compared a regimen of single-dose NVP (the HIVNET 012 regimen) to a regimen of single-dose NVP plus up to 6 weeks of daily NVP to the infant for prevention of HIV transmission in breastfeeding infants. We analyzed HIV genotypic resistance, phenotypic resistance, and replication capacity in Ugandan infants in this study.

Methods:  Plasma samples were available from 49 (71%) of 69 infants diagnosed with HIV infection by 6 weeks of age (24 in the single-dose NVP arm; 25 in the extended NVP arm). In the extended NVP arm, the median number of NVP doses received was 14 (range 3 to 33) in infants diagnosed with HIV infection at birth (n = 17), 14 (range 7 to 26) in infants diagnosed at 2 weeks of age (n = 5), and 34 (range 21 to 35) in infants diagnosed with HIV infection by 6 weeks of age (n = 3). Samples were analyzed using the ViroSeq system, the PhenoSense GT assay (Monogram Biosciences), and a quantitative point mutation assay (LigAmp, for K103N, Y181C, and G190A). If NVP resistance was detected at 6 weeks, a 6-month sample was tested. 

Results:  Maternal CD4 cell count, infant viral load, and HIV subtypes were similar in the 2 study arms. Using ViroSeq, NVP resistance was detected at 6 weeks in a higher portion of infants in the extended NVP arm compared to the SD NVP arm (21/25=84% vs. 12/24=50%, p=0.01).  A higher portion of infants in the extended NVP arm also had at least one NVP resistance mutation detected using the LigAmp assay (19 of 25 = 79% vs 7 of 24 = 35%, p = 0.004). In the extended NVP arm, detection of NVP resistance was not associated with the number of NVP doses received or the HIV status at birth. Among infants with resistance at 6 weeks, only 1 of 6 infants in the single-dose NVP arm had NVP resistance detected by ViroSeq at 6 months. In contrast, all 7 infants in the extended NVP arm still had NVP resistance detected at 6 months. Phenotypic resistance results were available for 42 (85.7%) of 49 infants analyzed at 6 weeks. The portion of infants with phenotypic resistance was higher in the extended NVP arm than in the single-dose NVP arm (19 of 22 = 86.3% vs 9 of 20 = 45%, p = 0.005). Phenotypic results were consistent with genotypic resistance results. The median HIV RC was similar among infants in the 2 study arms, and among infants with and without NVP resistance.

Conclusions:  HIV-infected Ugandan infants who received extended NVP prophylaxis were more likely to have genotypic and phenotypic NVP resistance than those who received only single-dose NVP.