627a 
Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir in Pregnant Women
Annette Haberl*1, R Linde1, A Reitter1, P Gute2, G Knecht2, M Mosch3, T Lennemann1, G Nisius1, C Stephan1, and S Staszewski1
1Hosp of JW Goethe Univ, Frankfurt, Germany; 2Infektiologikum, Frankfurt, Germany; and 3Medical Practice, Frankfurt, Germany
Background:
The use of tenofovir (TDF) for the treatment of pregnant women is one of the
most controversially discussed issues of the revised European AIDS Clinical
Society (EACS) guidelines. Because of the lack of data, the EACS guidelines
recommend not initiating TDF, but possibly continuing during pregnancy.
Furthermore a triple NRTI combination is contra-indicated. Therefore the safety
and efficacy of TDF-containing regimens in pregnancy must be assessed.
Methods: All
pregnant women from the Frankfurt HIV Cohort who had received TDF were
analyzed. The main indication for TDF was zidovudine (AZT) intolerance or
resistance. When the woman could not use nevirapine (CD4 >250), had poor
adherence or was intolerant to protease inhibitors (PI), triple NRTI combination
of TDF, AZT plus emtricitabine (FTC) or lamivudine (3TC) was initiated. The
safety and efficacy during the pregnancy and the fetal outcome were analyzed.
Results:
From December 2002 until December 2007, 76 pregnant woman received
TDF-containing regimens. All 78 children were delivered by caesarean
section; there was no HIV transmission; no TDF-related toxicity was observed in
the children; 2 women stopped TDF, because of exanthema (1) and nausea (1). The
tables below summarize the data of mothers and children.
|
Mothers (n = 76)
|
|
Mean age (years)
|
32
|
|
Ethnic origin (%)
|
African 53, caucasian 36, Hispanic 7,
others 4
|
|
AIDS (%)
|
12
|
|
ART-naοve (%)
|
68
|
|
Mean onset of TDF in pregnancy (weeks)
|
pregnancy week 24
|
|
ART
|
|
|
TDF+AZT+FTC or 3TC
|
n = 53
(70%)
|
|
TDF+NRTI+PI/r
|
n = 13 (17%)
|
|
TDF+NRTI+NNRTI
|
n = 5 (6.5%)
|
|
other
|
n = 5 (6.5%)
|
|
Mean baseline CD4 (cells/΅L)
|
384 (101390)
|
|
Mean baseline viral load (copies/mL)
|
41,970 (<40559,000)
|
|
Mean CD4 at delivery (cells/΅L)
|
447 (801247)
|
|
Mean viral load at delivery (copies/mL)
|
128 (<401780)
|
|
Adverse events (n)
|
cystitis (12), early contractions (6), gestational diabetes
(4), nausea (3), rupture of membranes (3), pyelonephritis (1), pre-eclampsy
(1), exanthema (1)
|
|
Children (n=78)
|
|
Mean time of caesarean (weeks)
|
37 (3140)
|
|
Mean birth weight (g)
|
2880 (15254270)
|
|
Mean intrauterine TDF exposure (weeks)
|
12 (140)
|
|
Mean follow-up (months)
|
20.5 (162)
|
|
Malformations (n)
|
Polydactily (3)*, diaphragm hernia (1)*,
renal cyst (1)*, cardial malformation in one child with down syndrome
|
|
*diagnosed
before the onset of TDF
|
Conclusions: In our study, TDF was effective and safe. All 78 exposed
children were HIV and had no signs of TDF-related toxicity. None of
the observed birth malformations was associated with TDF. Therefore, TDF should
be reconsidered for mother-to-child-transmission prophylaxis.
|