1016 
The Role of Condom Access on Condom Use in a Resource-limited Setting: The Case of Kilifi District, Kenya
Jacqueline Papo*1,2, E Bauni2, E Sanders2, and H Jaffe1
1Univ of Oxford, UK and 2Kenya Med Res Inst, Kilifi
Background: In Kenya, while HIV prevalence is high
(7.4%), condom use is low. This study investigates the role of geographic/financial
and social factors in determining condom access and use among the sexually
active general population. It was hypothesised that individuals with higher
levels of geographic/financial and social access would have higher levels of
condom uptake and consistency in use.
Methods: Using an urban (Kilifi Town) and rural
(Sokoke) site in the Demographic Surveillance Area in Kilifi district, Kenya:
all potential condom outlets (n = 278) were mapped; questionnaires on condom
access and use were administered to a random sample of individuals, male or female,
15 to 49 years old (n = 630, 322 urban, 308 rural). Geographical data were processed
using ArcMap 9.2, and STATA 9 was used for statistical analysis (c2 test, t test, and
logistic regression).
Results: Levels of condom use were higher among the
urban respondents than the rural respondents; levels of “high-risk” sex (with a
non-marital/non-cohabiting partner) were similar across both sites (Table 1). Table
2 shows the definition and prevalence of individuals with “no geographic/financial
barriers,” “no social barriers,” and “neither type of barrier.” Overall, only
7% had neither type of barrier. Controlling for factors associated with condom
use (gender, age, education, and high-risk sex), individuals with no geographic/financial/social
barriers were more likely to have reported condom use “ever,” “over the past 12
months,” and “most of the time.” This likelihood reached 13-fold (condom use
over the past 12 months) among individuals with neither type of barrier (Table
3).
Table 1. Level of condom use, urban versus rural site

Table 2. Prevalence of geographic/financial and social barriers

Table 3. Effect of geographic/financial and social
factors on condom use,
among the sexually active

Conclusions: In both the urban and rural study
sites, condom use was low, and full geographic/financial and social access to
condoms lacking. Controlling for socio-demographic factors and high-risk sex,
individuals with higher levels of condom access had higher levels of uptake and
consistency in use. These results point to the key role of efforts aimed at improving
geographic/financial and social access to condoms in resource-limited settings.
With fewer than a third of respondents using condoms “most of the time” during
high-risk sex, efforts must also include messages emphasising consistency.
|