32
Successful Primary Prevention of Cryptococcal Disease Using Fluconazole Prophylaxis in HIV-infected Ugandan Adults
Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi*1,2,3, A Kamali1, K Wakeham1, J Levin1, C Nabiryo Lwanga4, N Kenya-Mugisha5, A Coutinho6, J Whitworth7, H Grosskurth1, and D Lalloo2
1Med Res Council, Uganda Virus Res Inst, Entebbe; 2Liverpool Sch of Tropical Med, UK; 3Imperial Coll, Univ of London, UK; 4The AIDS Support Org, Kampala, Uganda; 5Ministry of Hlth, Uganda; 6Infectious Disease Inst, Kampala, Uganda; and 7Wellcome Trust, London, UK
Background: Cryptococcal disease remains a
significant cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals in
tropical settings, despite the introduction of ART. No large trial of
fluconazole as primary prophylaxis has been done in Africa.
Methods: We performed a prospective, double-blind
randomized controlled trial comparing 200-mg fluconazole 3x per week to
identical placebo in rural Uganda. We enrolled 1519, ART-naïve adults with CD4
counts <200. Patients were excluded if baseline cryptococcal antigen (CrAg)
was positive. Trial drug was commenced and participants actively referred to
local providers for ART. Participants were reviewed every 8 weeks and
encouraged to attend if unwell. After enrolment, 1335 (88%) participants
started ART at a median time of 74 days. Trial drug was continued until CD4
counts rose to 200 (median 197 days IQR 160 to 339). Primary end points were
invasive cryptoccocal disease and all cause mortality. Survival and time to end
points were assessed in intention to treat Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.
Cox’s proportional hazard regression models analyses were used to adjust for
the effect of ART and CD4 count.
Results: In all, 760 participants received
fluconazole and 759 received placebo: 19 participants developed definite
cryptococcal disease, 1 on fluconazole, and 18 on placebo (log rank X2 15.36
p = 0.0001) with an adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) of 0.053 (95%CI 0.007 to
0.4, p = 0.004); 12 developed cryptococcus before starting ART (11 on
placebo) and 7 while on ART (all placebo); fluconazole was effective both pre-ART
(log rank X2 = 8.02, p = 0.0046) and post-ART (log rank X2
= 7.45, p = 0.0064); 3 participants died of cryptococcal disease.
There was no difference in all cause mortality between fluconazole (n = 100)
and placebo (n = 98) arms. Fluconazole reduced esphageal Candida (aHR = 0.14,
95%CI 0.067 to 0.30, p = <0.0001), oropharyngeal and vaginal Candida
(aHR = 0.15, 95%CI 0.097 to 0.22, p = <0.001). The frequency of
elevated transaminases (>5x upper limit) was similar in both arms (aHR = 0.94,
95%CI 0.65 to 1.35 p = <0.47).
Conclusions: Fluconazole proved to be safe and
effective prophylaxis against cryptococcal disease, both before starting ART
and during early ART. Cryptococcal infection was less common than in routine
practice, probably because of the exclusion of those with positive CrAg. The
case fatality rate was low because of rapid diagnosis and treatment. In
programmatic use, fluconazole has a potential for even greater benefit.
|