46
Complete Protection against Repeated Vaginal Simian HIV Exposures in Macaques by a Topical Gel Containing Tenofovir Alone or with Emtricitabine
Charles Dobard*1, U Parikh1, S Sharma1, M-E Cong1, J Smith1, G Garcia-Lerma1, F Novembre2, R Otten1, T Folks1, and W Heneine1
1CDC, Atlanta, GA, US and 2Yerkes Primate Res Ctr, Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA, US
Background: Globally HIV continues to spread, primarily
through heterosexual sex. In the absence of an effective vaccine, topical gels containing
single or combination ARV drugs may provide a prevention option against HIV
acquisition. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) studies in the macaque model
showed that oral dosing with the reverse transcriptase inhibitor, tenofovir
(TFV), can be protective but a combination of TFV and emtricitabine (FTC) was
required to increase efficacy. To identify and evaluate the most effective
modality for topical ARV gels, we used a repeat-challenge macaque model that
closely resembles human transmission. Here we compared the efficacy of gels
containing TFV alone or in combination with FTC in preventing vaginal simian
HIV (SHIV) infection.
Methods: We performed 20 intravaginal SHIVSF162p3
challenged twice-weekly with a low-dose (10 TCID50) inoculum. Female
pigtail macaques were assigned to a no gel arm (n = 2), placebo gel arm (2%
hydroxyethyl cellulose [HEC]; n = 9), TFV gel arm (1% TFV; n = 6), or
combination gel arm (5% FTC and 1% TFV; n = 6). We applied 3 mL of gel
vaginally 30 minutes before intravaginal challenge. Infection was monitored by
serology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of SHIV gag
sequences from plasma. Systemic drug absorption was determined by measuring
plasma drug levels 30 minutes after gel application using liquid
chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).
Results: Of 11 macaques in the control arms, 10 were
infected after a median of 4 challenges; 2 of 2 in the no-gel arm and 8 of 9 in
the placebo gel arm (range, 2 to 11 challenges). In contrast, 6 of 6 macaques receiving
TFV gel and 6 of 6 macaques receiving FTC/TFV gel remained uninfected after 20
challenges, demonstrating that both TFV alone and when combined with FTC
provided very significant protection (p <0.005; Fisher’s exact test).
Low levels of FTC (median, 67 ng/mL) or TFV (median, 22 ng/mL) were consistently
detected in plasma at the time of virus challenge.
Conclusions: We show that application of a TFV or
FTC/TFV gel consistently protects from vaginal SHIV infection. The low levels
of drugs in plasma 30 minutes after gel application suggested rapid drug
absorption with relatively higher levels of drug remaining in the genital tissues.
The complete protection achieved by TFV gel in this model identifies a very
effective strategy for human trials and suggests that combinations of topical
drugs may not be required for highly effective prophylaxis.
|