980 
No Effect of Prior Nevirapine Use on 6-Month Virologic and CD4 Responses after Commencement of Efavirenz-based Combination ART in a Cohort of South African HIV+ Females
Judith Dlamini*1, A Pau2, D Follmann2, Z Hu2, M Hlongwane1, T Mokhathi1, M Williams1, H Highbarger3, R Dewar3, H Somaroo1, and Phidisa Study Group
1Phidisa Project, South African Military Hlth Svc, Pretoria; 2NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD, US; and 3SAIC, Frederick, MD, US
Background: Prior nevirapine (NVP) for prevention of
mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) has been associated with selection of
NNRTI-resistant mutations, which may significantly reduce the efficacy of an
NNRTI-based combination ART (cART ), resulting in early virologic failure and
poor CD4 gain. We investigated the effect of prior NVP use on viral responses
and CD4 gain for patients after cART initiation.
Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of
prior NVP use in Phidisa II, a completed, randomized, controlled trial
comparing the safety and efficacy of 4 first-line cART regimens among a South
African military healthcare cohort. Patients with <7 days of prior ART were
randomized to 1 of 4 regimens containing either efavirenz (EFV) or lopinavir/ritonavir
(LPV/r). Information from patients who reported prior use of NVP was recorded
at study entry. The level of virologic failure (defined as HIV-1 RNA >400
copies/mL) and CD4 count changes at 6 months after cART, were compared between
NVP and no NVP exposure (no-NVP) women. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare
rates of virologic failure between the 2 groups, while the t test was
used to compare CD4 change.
Results: At study entry, 1401 participants responded
to the question on prior ART use. Of these, 478 were women, of whom 392 had no
NVP exposure and 86 had NVP exposure. No participants reported the use of other
ARV in addition to NVP. Of the 478 women, 394 had HIV RNA observed 6 months
after cART initiation (324 no-NVP, 70 NVP). Of the no-NVP group, 30.1%
experienced virologic failure, compared to 31.4% in the NVP group (OR 1.1, p
= 0.886). When stratified for treatment arm, there was still no statistically
significant difference in failure rates among NVP vs no-NVP subjects (OR 0.98, p
= 1 over EFV arms, compared to OR 1.17, p = 0.70 over LPV/r arms). The
baseline to 6-month gain in CD4 counts was 15 cells greater for NVP-exposed
women in the EFV arms (p = 0.33) and 8 cells lower in the LPV/r arms (p
= 0.65).
Conclusions: In this cohort, prior NVP use had no
effect on virologic failure at 6 months, either over all arms or within
treatment arms (EFV vs LPV/r). There was also no effect of NVP on CD4 gain. This
lack of effect of prior NVP use may be due to the time lapse (although unknown)
between the NVP exposure and randomization. This suggests that NNRTI-based
regimens may be used with good results in patients with prior single-dose NVP
exposure.
|