574 
Immune Activation Markers during Raltegravir Intensification of a HAART Regimen in Subjects with Persistent HIV-1 Viral Suppression
Marta Massanella Luna*1, J Llibre2, M Larrousse3, P Domingo4, N Pérez-Alvarez2,5, C Caum2, B Clotet1,2, and J Blanco1
1IrsiCaixa Foundation, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain; 2Lluita contra la SIDA Foundation, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain; 3Servicio de enfermedades infecciosas. Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Spain; 4Servicio de enfermedades infecciosas, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Barcelona, Spain; and 5Statistics and Operations Research Department, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Background: While HAART reduces plasma HIV-1 viremia
to undetectable levels, replication-competent viruses persist
in a pool of infected resting CD4 T cells.
Immune responses are not able to completely clear this latent reservoir, thus
persisting immune activation. The aim of this study was to determine whether
intensification of a stable HAART with the HIV-1 integrase inhibitor raltegravir
(RAL) could reduce immunological activation in patients with persistent viral
suppression.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, controlled,
open-label study was performed including 51 HIV+ subjects with a CD4
T cell count ≥400 cells/mL and an
undetectable viral load (<50 copies/mL) for at least 1 year while on HAART.
Patients were randomized to intensify (n = 34) with RAL (400 mg twice daily)
during 48 weeks or to continue with their HAART (n = 18). Immune activation was
assessed in fresh blood by multicolor flow cytometric analysis using the
following combinations: CD45RA/CD31/CD38/CD3/CD4/CD8 and PD-1/HLA-DR/CD38/CD45RO/CD3/CD8
at baseline and weeks 2, 4, and 12. All data reported as mean ±SD.
Results: There were no baseline differences among
groups for sex, age, years of HIV infection, CD4 T cell count, PI or NNRTI use,
or immune activation (defined as CD8+HLA-DR+CD38+).
Baseline CD4 T cell count inversely correlated with immune activation (r
= –0.32, p = 0.025), but was not associated with time of infection. No
significant differences were observed from baseline to week 12 in each group for activated HLA-DR+CD38+ CD8 T cells (18±11
vs 21±12, p = 0.22 and 18±10 vs 17±9, p = 0.79 for baseline and
week 12 in control and intensified groups, respectively). Other markers of
immune activation potentially related to viral replication, such as the
expression of CD38 in memory CD8 T cells (CD8+CD45RO+)
and CD4 T cells (CD4+CD45RA–), were similar all
throughout the study. Moreover, intensified subjects did not show any
significant difference in their levels of activated CD8 T (CD8+HLA-DR+CD38+)
cells when compared to the control group at any point studied (19±10 vs 15±7, p
= 0.19 at week 2, 17±9 vs 18±9, p = 0.81 at week 4 and 18±9 vs 21±12, p
= 0.23 at week 12).
Conclusions:
Short-term (12 weeks) treatment intensification with RAL in virologically
suppressed patients on a stable HAART did not induce significant changes in
immune activation markers. The effect of longer intensification periods on
immune activation remains unknown.
|