595 
NNRTI Outcomes among HIV-1C-infected Adults Receiving First-line HAART in Botswana: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial
William Wester*1,2, H Bussman2,3, A Thomas3, V Degruttola3,4, O Okezie2, S Moyo2, M Mine5, J Makhema2, M Essex2,3, and R Marlink2,3
1Vanderbilt Univ Sch of Med, Nashville, TN, US; 2Botswana-Harvard AIDS Inst Partnership; 3Harvard Sch of Publ Hlth, Boston, MA, US; 4Harvard Statistical Data Analysis Ctr, Boston, MA, US; and 5Ministry of Hlth, Botswana
Background: National initiatives offering
NNRTI-based ART have recently commenced in Sub-Saharan Africa. In developed
countries, efavirenz (EFV) is the NNRTI of choice, but in Sub-Saharan Africa,
where women are the majority of those on ART, nevirapine (NVP) is widely used.
Therefore, direct EFV vs NVP comparisons similar to the 2NN trial (an
open-label, randomized, comparative trial of NVP- vs EFV-based HAART regimens) are
urgently needed. The Tshepo Study is the first clinical trial evaluating the
long-term efficacy and tolerability of ART-treated adults in Botswana.
Methods: Completed, open-label, randomized study of
650 antiretroviral-naïve adults treated for 3 years, using a 3x2x2 factorial
design comparing efficacy and tolerability among: A: zidovudine (ZDV)/lamivudine
(3TC) vs ZDV/didanosing (ddI) vs stavudine (d4T)/3TC; B: EFV vs NVP, and C: community-based
directly observed therapy (DOT) vs standard of care. This abstract focuses on factor
B (EFV vs NVP). Baseline viral load was >55,000 and 2 CD4+
strata: <201 vs 201 to 350. Intent-to-treat analyses included survival
analyses, longitudinal ANOVA, and logistic regression.
Results: At baseline there were 451 females (69.4%)
and 199 males; median age 33.3 years, median baseline CD4+ 199 (IQR
134 to 239), plasma HIV-1 RNA 204,000 (IQR 81,000 to 447,000). Median follow-up
151 weeks (IQR 125 to 156); overall loss to follow-up 8.3%. EFV- vs NVP-treated
patients had equivalent immunologic and virologic suppression rates: at 1, 2,
and 3 years, respectively, median CD4+ increase from baseline were
138 (IQR 74 to 223), 217 (IQR 122 to 332), and 258 (IQR 146 to 387), and 92.5%,
91.7%, and 91.1% had undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels. Kaplan-Meier survival
estimate was 94.0%, with no difference by NNRTI. Rates of virologic failure
with genotypic resistance mutations were 4.5% NVP vs 2.5% EFV, log rank p
= 0.05. No difference was found in overall virologic failure rates. Toxicities required
treatment modifications in 124 patients had (25.2% NVP vs 12.9% EFV, p =
0.0001), notably NVP-related hepatoxicity (2.3%) and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
(1.8%).
Conclusions: There were differences in virologic and
tolerability outcomes, but not CD4+ response among randomized adults
receiving NVP- vs EFV-based ART. Treatment-modifying toxicities and virologic
failure with resistance were higher among those receiving NVP, stressing the
need to closely monitor safety and efficacy during treatment, but overall
virologic failure rates did not differ across NNRTI. Until further data are available,
NVP should continue as a component of ART in Sub-Saharan Africa, where 65 to 70%
of adults on ART are female, pregnancy rates are high, and EFV-related
teratogenicity is a risk.
|