Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 164 Poster Abstracts
Screening and Barriers to Care for HIV-infected Adolescents
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 1-2:30 pm
Poster Hall


906    
Characteristics Associated with Retention for Hard-to-Reach Young Men of Color Who Have Sex with Men
Manya Magnus*1, K Jones1, G Phillips II1, D Binson2, L Hightow-Weidman3, C Richards-Clarke4, A Wohl5, A Outlaw6, T Giordano7, B Nyanthi8, and the Young MSM of Color SPNS Initiative Study Group
1George Washington Univ Sch of Publ Hlth and Hlth Svcs, Washington, DC, US; 2Ctr for AIDS Prevention Svcs, Univ of California, San Francisco, US; 3Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US; 4Bronx AIDS Svcs Inc and Children`s Hosp at Montefiore Med Ctr, NY, US; 5Los Angeles County Hlth Dept, CA, US; 6Horizons Project, Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI, US; 7Baylor Coll of Med, Houston, TX, US; and 8AIDS Project East Bay, Oakland, CA, US

Background:  Young men of color who have sex with men (YMCSM) represent a subpopulation at risk of infection and lack of access to HIV-related clinical care. In 2003, the US Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) funded 8 demonstration sites and 1 evaluation center for a Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) to identify best practices for outreach, linkage, entry, and retention in care for HIV+ YMCSM.

Methods:  The purpose of this study is to characterize factors associated with poor retention among this cohort of hard-to-reach YMCSM newly entered into care. Data were collected quarterly by face-to-face interview and chart abstraction for HIV+ YMCSM at the 8 sites. Uni-, bivariate, and GEE methods were used to describe characteristics associated with missing a quarterly visit due to inability to contact the participant following a missed study or clinic visit. Analyses were conducted in Stata 9.0se.

Results: Of 224 participants, 72.7% were African American, 28.3% Latino; 66.5% were 19 to 22 years old, 35.0% still in school, and 36.8% living with parents. At baseline, 20.3% had HIV viral load of ≥100,000 and 12.2% had CD4 <200. Of 529 expected follow-up visits, 69 (13.0%) were not completed with the majority due to not being able to reach client (75.4%) or medical crisis/hospitalization (20.3%); 12.9% of participants ever missed a visit due to non-contact. Prior to adjustment for confounders, disclosure of HIV status to a parent was associated with being less likely to miss a visit due to non-contact (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.17 to 0.84) as was having parent’s medical insurance (0.09, 0.02 to 0.54). After adjusting for insurance and school status, CD4 count <200 and age ≥21 were associated with missing at least one visit for non-contact (OR 5.34, 95%CI 1.10 to 25.98 and OR 7.14, 95%CI 1.05 to 50.00, respectively). Reporting a period of depression or suicidal ideation was associated with being less likely to miss a visit (OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.80).

Conclusions:  Among hard-to-reach YMCSM adolescents, retention was a greater challenge for older individuals and those with lower CD4 counts, suggesting differential adolescent needs across the span of adolescence and disease staging. Previously reported barriers to adolescent care, including depression, disclosure to parents, and parental insurance did not appear to affect retention in this cohort. Youth- and patient-specific retention strategies are necessary to develop novel approaches to providing this high-risk population with continuity of HIV care.