1041 
Demographics and Characteristics of Undiagnosed HIV in an Urban Emergency Department
H Clauss1, J Collins2, Shaden Eldakar-Hein*2, B Palermo3, N Gentile1, S Adige4, W Pace3, C Duffalo2, J Menajovsky2, and R Bettiker1
1Temple Univ Sch of Med, Philadelphia, PA, US; 2Temple Univ Hosp, Philadelphia, PA, US; 3Drexel Univ Coll of Med, Philadelphia, PA, US; and 4Haverford Coll, PA, US
Background: The US Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) recommend offering HIV testing to persons admitted to
emergency departments (ED). Some ED have found a seroprevalence of
approximately 1% when rapid testing is offered. The true seropositivity rate is
unknown.
Methods: Over a 2-week period, demographic and
clinical data were extracted from the charts of all ED patients the day after
care was provided. Any remaining blood from these patients was linked to the
extracted data by a 7-digit random number and all identifying information was
then destroyed. HIV testing was performed with the OraQuick Advance Rapid
HIV-1/2 Antibody Test (OraSure Technologies, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania) on the
blood samples. This study was approved by the local and state Institutional
Review Boarads (IRB).
Results: Over the 2-week period, 2427 patients
were seen in the ED and 2019 charts were available for review. Of these, 942 patients
had blood available for rapid HIV testing: 133 (14%) of samples were reactive;
64 of 515 (12%) were women, 69 of 427 (16%) were men; 9 of 96 (9%) were
Caucasian, 95 of 649 (15%) were African American, 15 of 119 (13%) were Latino,
and 11 of 26 (24%) were unknown race; 5 of 23 (22%) of pregnant patients in the
ED were reactive; 28 patients reported a history of HIV, but only 25 of them
tested positive. There was no difference in disposition: 82 of the 610 (13%)
admissions were reactive; 48 of 321 (15%) discharges were reactive.
Conclusions: HIV seroprevalence in our urban ED is
high. Other ED (including our own) have found a seropositivity of 0.8 to 1.5%
when the rapid test is offered directly to patients. This latter method may
underestimate the true prevalence of HIV among ED patients. More resources may
need to be dedicated to diagnosing these infections.
|