604
Frequent Occurrence of Virologic Re-suppression without Change in Therapy after High-level Virologic Rebound in Africa
Elvin Geng*1, N Emenyonu2, P Hunt1, M Bwana3, N Musinguzi3, J Bennett1, H Cao1, S Deeks1, J Martin1, and D Bangsberg2
1Univ of California, San Francisco, US; 2Harvard Univ, Boston, MA, US; and 3Mbarara Univ of Sci and Tech, Uganda
Background: When viewed from the perspective of
cross-sectional research studies, the vast majority of HIV-infected patients using
ART in Africa achieve virologic suppression. However, the lack of frequent
longitudinal virologic monitoring in large numbers of patients has limited our
finer understanding of the occurrence and outcomes of detectable viremia. Indeed,
early reports have identified an unexpected incidence of detectable viremia,
which has been subsequently re-suppressed without ART change. We sought to describe
the occurrence and outcomes of high-level viral rebound in a well characterized
group of HIV-infected African adults.
Methods: We evaluated HIV-infected adults initiating
NNRTI-based ART in the Uganda AIDS Rural Treatment Outcomes (UARTO) cohort in Mbarara, Uganda. We collected quarterly plasma HIV RNA levels and medication event
monitoring systems (MEMS) data, which counts how many times a day a pill bottle
is opened. For this analysis, high-level rebound was defined as at least 1 HIV
RNA measurement <400 copies/mL in the first 6 months of ART followed by a
value > 10,000 copies/mL.
Results: Between June 2005 and August of 2008, 350
patients achieved at least 1 HIV RNA measurement <400 copies/mL in the first
6 months. Subsequently, the cumulative incidence of virologic rebound to >10,000
copies/mL at 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 years was 2.8, 8.8, 13.7, and 15.7%. Of the 37
individuals with virologic rebound, 34 had at least 1 subsequent HIV RNA
measurement. Of these 34, 17 (50%) resuppressed to <400 copies/mL while
remaining on an NNRTI-based regimen, 7 (21%) resuppressed after switch to a PI-based
regimen, and 10 (29%) failed to resuppress (2 of whom had been switched to
PI-based ART). MEMS data were available in 14 patients who experienced resuppression
without ART change; treatment interruptions of at least 48 hours were seen in 5
patients (36%), sporadic non-adherence without any intervals >48 hours in 4 (29%),
and adherence > 95% in the remaining 5 (36%).
Conclusions: As has been seen in other African-based
cohorts, many patients with high-level virologic rebound subsequently achieve
virologic resuppression without switch to a new “salvage” regimen. While the
mechanisms for this apparent transient high-level viremia require further
investigation, this suggests that an episode of high level virologic rebound on
an NNRTI does not always preclude subsequent effectiveness of the regimen.
|