57
A “Modern Response” to a “Modern Epidemic”: HIV/AIDS in the District of Columbia
Shannon Hader
District of Columbia Dept of Hlth, HIV/AIDS Admin, US
The District of Columbia, an urban area of approximately
600,000 persons, is experiencing a “modern” HIV epidemic—“modern” in its scale
and complexity. An estimated 3 to 5% of the total adult population is currently
living with HIV or AIDS. New AIDS rates are the nation’s highest: at 118
cases/100,000 population, these rates are more than twice as high as New York City, and nearly 4 times as high as Detroit (51 and 32 cases/100,000,
respectively). Modes of transmission for new HIV diagnoses (2001 to 2006)
were: 37% heterosexual, 26% men who have sex with men (MSM), and 15%
intravenous drug users (IDU). Racial health disparities are prominent, with 55%
of residents but 81% of HIV/AIDS cases being among African Americans. The
District is building a “modern” response to its “modern” epidemic, focusing on
bold leadership, innovative and comprehensive services, and data-based planning
and decision-making. Key new initiatives include: scale-up of routine
opt-out HIV testing; the DC NEX needle exchange program; comprehensive
school-based sex education and sexually transmitted diseases (STD) testing; the
DC Condom Program; innovative partnerships for community capacity-building,
antiretroviral drug security, and research; strengthening the community
prevention response through supports for faith-based leadership,
couples-services, and parent-child communications skills. Innovative strategies
among long-term HIV primary care providers include a 3-component focus on:
“Navigator” services to link newly diagnosed persons to a medical home;
“Recapture” services to bring “lost” clients back into care; and the “Health
First” approach utilizing new electronic medical record capacities to direct
client-level and clinic-level efficiencies and performance targets. Cross-cutting
all interventions is a priority of making the most accurate data on the
epidemic available and usable to all partners, and strengthening routine
monitoring and evaluation systems to promote accountability, quality, and
effect.
|