Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 18 Oral Abstracts
Mechanisms of Drug Resistance and Optimal Timing of ART
Session Day and Time: Monday, 4-6:15 pm
Presentation Time: 6:00 pm
Room: Room 517b-d


72LB
When Should HIV-1-infected Persons Initiate ART? Collaborative Analysis of HIV Cohort Studies
Jonathan Sterne and the When To Start Consortium
Univ of Bristol, UK

Background:  The CD4 count at which ART should be initiated is a central, unresolved issue in the care of HIV-1-infected patients. In the absence of randomized trials, we examined this question in prospective cohort studies.

Methods:  ARV-naļve patients from 15 cohort studies, who started ART after 1997 with CD4 <550 cells/mm3, AIDS-free and without a history of injection drug use, were eligible (ART Cohort Collaboration). We estimated distributions of lead-time (time from upper to lower CD4 threshold) and unseen events (events occurring before reaching the lower threshold) in the absence of treatment using data on 21,247 patients followed in seven cohort studies during the pre-ART era, and used these to impute completed datasets including lead-time and unseen events. We compared the effect of deferred with immediate initiation of ART on rates of AIDS and death, and death, in adjacent CD4 ranges of width 100 cells/mm3.

Results: The table shows estimated hazard ratios for the effect of deferring ART compared with immediate initiation, for different CD4 ranges. Deferring until CD4 count range 251 to 350 cells/mm3 was associated with higher rates of AIDS and death, compared with starting in the range 351 to 450 cells/mm3. The adverse effect of deferring ART increased with decreasing CD4 threshold. Deferring ART was associated with higher mortality rates, although effects on mortality were less marked than effects on AIDS and death.

 

Estimated hazard ratios for AIDS or death, comparing deferring ART to a lower CD4 range with starting in a higher CD4 range

Higher CD4 range

Lower CD4 range

Hazard ratio (95%CI)

451 to 550

351 to 450

0.99 (0.76 to 1.29)

426 to 525

326 to 425

1.12 (0.87 to 1.43)

401 to 500

301 to 400

1.09 (0.85 to 1.38)

376 to 475

276 to 375

1.19 (0.96 to 1.47)

351 to 450

251 to 350

1.28 (1.04 to 1.57)

326 to 425

226 to 325

1.21 (1.01 to 1.46)

301 to 400

201 to 300

1.34 (1.12 to 1.61)

276 to 375

176 to 275

1.59 (1.30 to 1.95)

251 to 350

151 to 250

1.71 (1.43 to 2.04)

226 to 325

126 to 225

2.01 (1.73 to 2.35)

201 to 300

101 to 200

2.21 (1.91 to 2.56)

176 to 275

76 to 175

2.61 (2.27 to 3.00)

151 to 250

51 to 150

2.59 (2.29 to 2.92)

126 to 225

26 to 125

2.88 (2.56 to 3.25)

101 to 200

0 to 100

3.35 (2.99 to 3.75)

Conclusions:  In the absence of evidence from a randomized controlled trial (the only design that can exclude the influence of unmeasured confounding) these findings should help guide physicians and patients balancing treatment benefits and toxicities in deciding when to initiate ART.