Paper # 766 
High Levels of Severe Dysplasia Detected in Anal Biopsies from HIV-infected Men Who Have Sex with Men in Sydney, Australia
L Botes1, D Cooper2,3, D Marriott2, Sarah Pett*3, A Carr2, S Carbone2, N Kumaradeva2, and R Hillman1,2
1Univ of Sydney, Australia; 2St Vincent’s Hosp, Sydney, Australia; and 3Univ of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Background: Although rare in the general community,
anal cancer is now the most common non-AIDS defining cancer amongst the
HIV-infected community in Australia, with rates are as high as 137/100,000 in
HIV-infected Men who have Sex with Men (MSM). In order to investigate the
potential role of anal cytological screening, we conducted a prospective study
of HIV-infected MSM attending a HIV clinic in Sydney. Men with significant
cytological abnormalities were then referred for High Resolution Anoscopy
(HRA).
Methods: Self-collected anal cytological samples
were obtained using moistened Dacron swabs and then eluted into ThinprepTM
vials for subsequent analysis. Men yielding a cytological result of Atypical
Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS), Atypical Squamous Cells –
possible High grade (ASC-H) or High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
(HSIL) were then referred for HRA.
Results: In the study, 196 men participated. The age
range was 25 to 75 years (median 50 years), with a median duration of HIV
infection of 15 years. The current median CD4 was 488 106/mL and their median CD4 nadir 213 106/mL; 91% were taking antiretroviral therapy at
the time of assessment. A single self-collected anal cytological
specimen was obtained from each participant, of which, 172 (89%) were
technically satisfactory. Of the technically satisfactory, 45 (23%) were
cytologically normal, 75 (38%) had Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
(LSIL), 26 (13%) had ASCUS, 17 (9%) ASC-H, and 9 (5%) HSIL. Of the 52 men (30%)
had significantly abnormal anal cytology, defined as ASCUS, ASC-H and HSIL. 50
men underwent HRA and two men declined. Two men (4%) had no visual
abnormalities and 48 (96%) men were biopsied. No person was diagnosed with anal
cancer. High grade dysplasia (HSIL) was confirmed on biopsy in 29 (58%) of the
48 men who had undergone HRA. Thus, overall, severe dysplasia was detected in
29 (14.7%) of 196 screened men.
Conclusions: Self-administered cytological screening
yielded technically satisfactory results in most men and identified high rates
of significant anal dysplasia. Our estimate of the prevalence of HSIL is likely
to represent an underestimate, as neither anal cytology nor HRA are 100%
sensitive at detecting these abnormalities. Closer monitoring of these
men is indicated until a clearer understanding of progression and regression
rates is established. Interventions designed to prevent progression of HSIL to
anal cancer need to be urgently evaluated.
|