Paper # 149
Prevalence of Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus in Prostate Cancer
William Switzer*, H Jia, H Q Zheng, S Tang, and W Heneine
CDC, Atlanta, GA, US
Background: Recently, a xenotropic murine
leukemia-related virus (XMRV) was identified by virus-generic microarray and polymerase
chain reaction testing in 40% of prostate cancer tissues with the homozygous R462Q
(QQ) variant of the antiviral RNase L enzyme. Two subsequent studies confirmed
XMRV sequences in prostate cancers at a lower polymerase chain reaction
prevalence (1.5% and 6%) independent of R462Q polymorphism. One of the studies
also reported higher detection of XMRV proteins by immunohistochemistry in 23%
of cancers. To further evaluate the prevalence of XMRV in prostate cancer and
better define markers of infection, we developed new molecular and serologic
assays and used them to screen tissue and plasma specimens from patients with prostate
cancer.
Methods: We developed both a xenotropic murine
leukemia virus-based Western blot assay for antibody detection, and new gag,
polymerase (pol), and envelope (env) polymerase chain reaction
assays for sequence detection. To detect contamination with mouse DNA, we also
designed a mouse-specific mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymerase chain reaction
test. Following assay validation, prostate tissue (n = 162) and matching plasma
(n = 120) from anonymous US prostate cancer patients were tested. Phylogenetic
analysis by neighbor-joining methods was used to infer evolutionary
relationships. RNase L R462Q polymorphism in all patients was determined using
a commercial test.
Results: Of 165 prostate tissues, 2 (1.2%) were
positive by pol and env polymerase chain reaction and had
undetectable mouse mtDNA. Phylogenetic analysis showed distinct sequences that clustered
with other XMRV. Plasma from both persons (5956 and 6203) were negative by reverse
transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction indicating absence of viremia. Both
patients were Western blot-negative. Plasma from 118 additional polymerase
chain reaction-negative patients tested Western blot negative. Of the patients,
45.1% were R462Q RR homozygotes, 45.6% RQ, and 9.3 % QQ. Person 5956 was RR
homozygous; patient 6203 was heterozygous (RQ). Both had intermediate-grade
tumors based on Gleason scoring.
Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a low prevalence
of XMRV sequences in prostate cancer patients that is not likely associated
with R462Q RNase L genotype. Infection with XMRV is confirmed by phylogenetic
analysis and absence of contaminating mouse DNA. The finding of undetectable
antibodies and viremia in 2 patients is noteworthy and may reflect sequestered
or cleared infections. More studies are needed to better understand the
prevalence and significance of XMRV in prostate cancer or other diseases.
|