Paper # 449 
Bayesian Phylogeography of HIV among MSM in the UK Indicates a Few Source Areas of Widespread Infection
Lucy Weinert*1, G Hughes2, E Fearnhill3, D Dunn3, A Rambaut1, A Leigh Brown1, and on behalf of the UK Collaborative Group on HIV Drug Resistance
1Univ of Edinburgh, UK; 2Hlth Protection Agency, Cambridge, UK; and 3Med Res Council Clin Trials Unit, London, UK
Background: Approximately 32,000 men
who have sex with men (MSM) in the UK are infected with HIV and recent data
suggest that infection prevalence doubled between 1999 and 2007. This trend
highlights the need for more effective control strategies and a better
understanding of the dynamics of transmission within this risk group. Research
focusing on the global pandemic of HIV indicates strong spatial structuring of
different HIV subtypes, but less is known about viral gene flow on smaller temporal and spatial scales.
Methods: Epidemiologically linked
clusters were identified from 14,560 subtype B HIV partial pol sequences by
finding sequences with a close genetic match and using these sequences to build
a bootstrapped Neighbor-Joining phylogeny. A newly developed Bayesian
phylodynamic method was then applied to 97 clusters that had 10 or more
individuals (giving a total of 1673 individuals) to estimate the rate of
geographical spread between 17 locations from the UK over the previous 10
years.
Results: For more than 70% of
clusters, at least half of all individuals came from one location,
supporting the assumption that our method accurately detects epidemiologically linked
individuals. Of clusters that were more heterogeneous, time-scaled phylogenies
showed that within the cluster, related viruses are generally found in the same
location. This reveals the areas where there is significant ongoing
transmission and the date since this has been occurring. However, there were
also some areas within clusters where infection was clearly seeded from
elsewhere. The highest rates of migration of viral strains were observed from London to Brighton and London to Manchester. Analyses of all other rates showed that most
other infections in the UK originated from these 3 key areas.
Conclusions: In contrast to the
early UK epidemic, where infection was heavily London-based, our results
suggest there is ongoing infection in other areas of the country. However,
analyses of geographical rate show that there are still only a few areas where
outward spread to other areas is significant. These results have implications
to help us in the future optimise where preventative strategies will be most
effective.
|