Paper # 844 
Impact of TB Co-infection on Viral Suppression Rates in HIV-infected Children
Brian Zanoni*1, H Zanoni2, H France2, T Phungula2, and M Feeney3
1Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, US; 2McCord Hosp, Durban, South Africa; and 3Univ of California, San Francisco, US
Background: The dual HIV and TB pandemics in
Southern Africa have lead to a dramatic increase in co-infected children.
Treatment of HIV-TB co-infection is complicated by metabolic drug interactions
and overlapping toxicities, particularly in children, for whom treatment
options are limited. Current South African guidelines advocate
lopinavir/ritonavir-based HAART for children <3 years old, and
Efavirenz-based HAART for older children. We hypothesized that interactions
between lopinavir/ritonavir and anti-tuberculosis therapy may decrease viral
suppression rates among co-infected children.
Methods: Virologic suppression rates among 892 children
who received HAART at 2 medical centers in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa were
analyzed retrospectively and the impact of co-treatment for tuberculosis on
viral suppression was assessed.
Results: In this study, 324 children (36.3%)
received simultaneous HIV and TB treatment. The overall rate of viral
suppression (<400 copies/mL) was 86% at 6 months and 88% at 12 months. Among
subjects who received concurrent treatment for HIV and TB, viral suppression
rates were lower (81% at 6 months and 82% at 12 months) than among those
without TB (88% and 90%; P =0.009 for both). When stratified by
initial ARV regimen, subjects who received NNRTI-based HAART had similar rates
of viral suppression whether they received concurrent TB therapy (87% and 85%
at 6 and 12 months) or not (91% and 90%; P =0.199 and P =0.123,
respectively). In contrast, children who received PI-based first line therapy
had significantly lower viral suppression rates with TB co-treatment (70% and
76% at 6 and 12 months) than without (82% and 90%; P =0.026 and
0.019). Among children who received TB therapy while on PI-based HAART, rates
of viral suppression at 6 months did not statistically differ whether the
regimen contained ritonavir (n = 23; 57%), standard lopinavir/ritonavir (n =
51; 71%) or double-dosed lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 36; 72%).
Conclusions: Concurrent treatment for TB is
associated with lower rates of viral suppression among children on HAART, but
this impact is limited to those receiving PI-based antiviral regimens (in South
Africa, generally infants and children <3 years). This may be due to
pharmacologic interactions (CYP450 induction), decreased adherence due to
overlapping toxicities or high pill burden, or biologic interactions.
Guidelines for the care of young HIV-TB coinfected infants should be
continually evaluated, as PI-based ARV may not provide optimal viral
suppression in this population.
|