Paper # 63
Antiretrovirals for HIV Prevention: Panacea or Pandora’s Box?
Kenneth Mayer
Brown Univ, Miriam Hosp, Fenway Hlth, Providence, RI, US
Background: With more than 2.5 million new HIV
infections annually, the use of HAART to decrease HIV transmission and
acquisition has gained increased attention. HAART decreases genital tract HIV,
and several studies have found that patients on ART may be likely to transmit
HIV to their partners. However, for HAART to be optimally effective for
prevention, patients will need to be adherent, have stable medical care, and
modify risk taking behaviors, since some residual genital secretion HIV may be
detected in some patients whose plasma viremia is suppressed on HAART,
particularly in the setting of inter-current sexually transmitted diseases. ART
may also be used to protect uninfected persons from HIV acquisition, either
administered prior to, or post, a high-risk exposure (PrEP or PEP). Animal
studies, a retrospective case-control, and observational data have helped to
demonstrate the utility of PEP. Animal data suggest that either topical or
systemic antiretroviral chemoprophylaxis may be effective, and studies are
currently underway in multiple countries, evaluating the efficacy of oral or
topical PrEP in diverse, high risk populations. Although tenofovir plus/minus
emtricitabine has been the most studied chemoprophylaxis medications, newer
studies are evaluating drugs with other mechanisms of actions, including entry
inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as well as
long-acting formulations delivered via intravaginal rings or injections.
Conclusions: If the current chemoprophylaxis studies
demonstrate efficacy, longer term monitoring will be needed to evaluate
potential long term toxicities, risk compensation, and virologic resistance, in
order to fully understand the risks and benefits of chemoprophylaxis.
|