Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 132-Poster Abstracts
Hepatitis: Cirrhosis, Cancer, and Transplant
Thursday, 2-4 pm; Poster Hall
Paper # 688    
Outcomes in HIV/HCV Hemophilic vs Non-hemophilic Transplant Candidates
Margaret Ragni*1, M DeVera1, M Roland2, M Wong3, V Stosor4, K Sherman5, D Hardy6, E Blumberg7, B Barin8, and P Stock2
1Univ of Pittsburgh, PA, US; 2Univ of California, San Francisco, US; 3Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA, US; 4Northwestern Univ, Chicago, IL, US; 5Univ of Cincinnati, OH, US; 6Cedars-Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA, US; 7Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, US; and 8EMMES Corp, Rockville, MD, US

Background:  Hepatitis C virus infection is the major cause of end-stage liver disease, and it is the major indication for liver transplantation among HIV-infected individuals. Individuals with hemophilia (H), in contrast to those without hemophilia (NH), acquired HCV at a very young age, specifically with the first transfusion in the first years of life. Thus, we sought to determine whether HIV/HCV co-infected hemophilic men experience poorer OLTX outcomes than those without hemophilia.

Methods:  MELD, CD4, HIV VL, HCV VL, HAART therapy, event rates and time-to-events, including transplant, rejection, and mortality, were compared between co-infected H and NH, from the same centers, participating in the multi-center HIV transplant study (HIVTR). Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank-sum test for comparison of continuous variables, Fisher’s exact test for comparison of categorical variables, and log-rank test for comparison of time-to-event curves.

Results:  Of 100 HIV/HCV enrolled candidates, 33 (33%) underwent liver transplantation, including 8 of 16 (50.0%) H and 25 of 84 (29.8%) NH. Currently fewer H transplant candidates remain alive, 3 (18.8%) than NH, 46 (54.8%); H were more likely to die pre-OLTX, 5 (31.3%), as compared with NH, 13 (15.5%), =0.03, primarily from sepsis and multi-organ failure. Hemophilic candidates reached OLTX (=0.06) and MELD of 25 (=0.09) marginally faster than non-hemophilic subjects. Although H were younger, 42 vs 48 yr, =0.004, there were no differences between H and NH in BMI, 24 vs 25, =0.54, CD4, 321 vs 281/µL, =0.57, detectable HIV RNA, 25.0% vs 13.1%, =0.25, or detectable HCV VL, 100% vs. 86.9%, =0.20. Time to post-OLTX death (P =0.67), graft loss (p=0.86), and treated rejection (=0.81) were similar. Rejection rates (95%CI) among H were 27% (7 to 72) at 1-year and 51% (18 to 92) at 3-year; and among NH were 40% (23 to 64) at 1-year and 48% (28 to 72) at 3-year. Post-OLTX survival (95%CI) among H was 75% (31 to 93) at 1-year and 56% (15 to 84) at 3-year; and among NH was 62% (39 to 78) at 1-year and 56% (33 to 74) at 3-year. Hepatocellular cancer was not a significant predictor of graft loss or survival.

Conclusions:  Among HIV+ hemophilic men, despite early acquisition of HCV, transplant outcomes appear to be similar to those in co-infected individuals without hemophilia. However, pre-transplant mortality appears higher among co-infected hemophilic men. Whether earlier intervention could reverse this finding is not known.