Paper # 652 
Comparison of Multispot Enyme Immunoassay with Western Blot for Confirmatory Serodiagnosis of HIV
Lucia Torian*, L Forgione, A Punsalang, and W Oleszko
New York City Dept of Hlth and Mental Hygiene, NY, US
Background: Recent improvements in the sensitivity
of enzyme immunoassays (EIA) used for HIV screening, coupled with increasing
recognition of the importance of rapid point-of-care testing, have led to
proposals to adjust the algorithm for serodiagnosis of HIV so that screening
and confirmation can be performed using a dual or triple EIA sequence that does
not require Western blotting for confirmation. One EIA that has been proposed
as a second or confirmatory test is the BioRad Multispot Rapid EIA. This test
would have the added advantage of differentiating between HIV-1 and HIV-2
antibodies. To compare the sensitivity and type-specificity of an algorithm, we
combined a third generation EIA followed by a confirmatory Multispot with the
conventional algorithm that combines a third generation EIA (BioRad GS
HIV-1-2+0 EIA) followed by confirmatory Western blot (BioRad GS HIV-1 Western
Blot).
Methods: The 8760 serum specimens submitted for HIV
testing to the New York City Public Health Laboratory between May 22, 2007 and
April 30, 2010, tested repeatedly positive on third generation HIV-1/2+0 EIA
screening and received parallel confirmatory testing by Western blot and
Multispot.
Results: Of 8760 specimens, 8678 (99.1%) tested Western
blot-positive and 82 (0.9%) tested Western blot-negative or indeterminate; 8690
specimens (99.2%) tested Multispot-positive, of which 14 (17.1%) had been
classified as negative or indeterminate by Western blot. Among the HIV-1 Western
blot-positive specimens, Multispot classified 26 (0.29%) as HIV-2. Among the
HIV-1 Western blot-negative and indeterminate, Multispot detected 12 HIV-2. Repeatedly
EIA reactive and Western blot/Multispot-negative/indeterminate were 3 pregnant
women who had no detectable HIV-1 RNA or HIV-2 DNA, and 1 EIA reactive and Western
blot/Multispot-negative had acute HIV infection. No additional submissions were
available for 60 specimens with unresolved or conflicting results.
Conclusions: Multispot detected an additional 14
HIV-1 infections among Western blot-negative or indeterminate specimens,
differentiated 26 HIV-1 Western blot-positives as HIV-2, and detected 12
additional HIV-2 infections among Western blot-negative/indeterminate. A dual
third generation EIA algorithm incorporating Multispot had equivalent HIV-1
sensitivity to the third generation EIA-Western blot algorithm and had the
added advantage of detecting 12 HIV-2 specimens that were not HIV-1 Western
blot cross-reactors. Further testing using nucleic acid detection as the gold
standard is needed to calculate specificity and validate the substitution of
Multispot for Western blot in the diagnostic algorithm.
|