699
Diagnosing Acute HIV Infection in North Carolina: Challenges and Opportunities
Kara McGee*1, S Kim1, A Johnson2, J Kuruc2, S McCoy2, L McNeil1, C Gay2, D Margolis2, J Eron2, and C Hicks1
1Duke Univ Med Ctr, Durham, NC, US and 2Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US
Background: Diagnosis of acute HIV infection is
challenging and has important clinical and public health implications.
Initiating ART during acute HIV infection decreases viral replication and may affect
HIV-specific immune responses. On a public health level, diagnosis and
treatment of acute HIV infection may reduce further spread of infection.
Methods: The Duke–UNC Acute HIV Infection Research
Consortium enrolls adult patients diagnosed within 30 days of HIV
seroconversion. We examined a prospective cohort of 110 persons diagnosed from
January 1998 to September 2007 to determine characteristics associated with acute
HIV infection diagnosis including demographics, site of initial presentation,
number of health care visits before diagnosis, and diagnosing clinician. Diagnosis
was considered to have been made when a diagnostic test was ordered (usually
HIV RNA by polymerase chain reaction).
Results: Complete data were available on 99 of 110 persons:
50 were white (45 male, 5 female), 49 nonwhite (40 male, 9 female); median age,
31 years (range 18 to 62). Acute HIV infection was diagnosed by voluntary
counseling and treatment programs (STAT) in 47 patients (20 white, 27nonwhite)
and via clinical care in 52 patients (30 white, 22 nonwhite). A higher proportion
of white patients (30 of 50 [60%]) was diagnosed clinically than nonwhite
patients (22 of 49 [45%]). Among clinically diagnosed cases, self-identified
HIV risk behaviors were injecting drug use (2), men having sex with men (38), and
heterosexual exposure (12). White patients were equally likely to present to a
routine care setting (primary care provider, student health clinic) or to an
urgent care setting (emergency department, urgent care clinic)—15 of 30 (50%)
for each. Nonwhite patients were more likely to present to an urgent care
setting—17 of 22 (77%). Symptoms at presentation were typical of acute HIV
infection—fever (83%), myalgia (58%), fatigue (55%), and nausea and vomiting
(55%). Most patients were not diagnosed at presentation; 42 of 52 (81%) required
more than 1 visit (median 2, range 1 to 4). Of those diagnosed at first
encounter 8 of 10 were nonwhite and 7 of 10 were diagnosed in urgent care
settings (most occurred after patients were admitted-considered an extension of
the initial presentation). Consulting Infectious Diseases physicians made most
diagnoses (58%).
Conclusions: Although most persons diagnosed in our
cohort presented to clinical care settings with symptoms of acute HIV infection,
early diagnosis was uncommon. Increased awareness of acute HIV infection symptoms
among primary care and emergency department providers might increase acute HIV
infection testing and diagnosis. This could favorably affect HIV transmission
and potentially facilitate appropriate early ART initiation.
|