Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 171 Poster Abstracts
Hepatitis C Co-infection: Fibrosis
Session Day and Time: Monday, 1-4 pm
Room: Hall B


1053
Improving the Differentiation of Mild from Significant Liver Fibrosis in HIV/HCV-co-infected Patients Using Transient Elastometry
Jose del Valle*1, J Macias1, P Barreiro2, A Rivero3, A Gutierrez4, M Rios-Villegas5, D Merino6, M Gonzalez-Serrano7, E Vispo2, and J Pineda8
1Hosp Univ de Valme, Seville, Spain; 2Hosp Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; 3Hosp Univ Reina Sofia, Cordoba, Spain; 4Hosp Univ Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain; 5Hosp Univ Virgen de la Macarena, Seville, Spain; 6Hosp Juan Ramon Jimenez, Huelva, Spain; 7Hosp Univ Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga, Spain; and 8Hosp Univ de Valme, Seville, Spain

Background:  Transient elastometry is accurate for detecting cirrhosis (F=4) in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) -co-infected patients. However, this procedure is less precise to differentiate mild (F ≤1) from significant (F ≥2) fibrosis. Thus, using the proposed cut-off value of 7.2 kPa, 24% HIV/HCV-co-infected patients are misclassified as having F ≤1 while they show F ≥2 in the liver biopsy, what may leave untreated patients with clear histological indication. The aim of this study was to elaborate and validate cut-off values of liver stiffness to better discriminate F ≤1 from F ≥2 in HIV/HCV-co-infected subjects.

Methods:  Liver stiffness measurements were performed in 197 co-infected patients who had undergone a liver biopsy within 12 months of transient elastometry. Patients had received no prior therapy against HCV infection.

Results: The area under the receiver operating-characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) was 0.86 (0.78 to 0.93) for F ≥2. To diagnose F ≥2, a cut-off value of 9.0 kPa showed a positive predictive value of 87%. Applying this cut-off in the validation set, 5 (12.5%) patients were misclassified. To discard F ≥2, a cut-off value of 6.0 kPa showed a negative predictive value of 90%. Using this cut-off in the validation group, 5 (15%) patients were misclassified. Considering all the patients, 61 (31%) yielded liver stiffness values ≤6.0 kPa and 81 (41%) showed liver stiffness values ≥9.0 kPa; 55 (28%) patients yielded intermediate values; no patient showing liver stiffness value ≤6.0 kPa presented F ≥3 in the liver biopsy. Likewise no patient with a liver stiffness value ≥9.0 kPa had F=0.

Conclusions:  We found that the diagnostic accuracy of transient elastometry to discriminate F ≤1 from F ≥2 was enhanced using a combination of two different cut-off values, liver stiffness ≤6.0 kPa was diagnostic of F ≤1 and LS ≥9.0 kPa detected reliably patients with F ≥2, compared with previously proposed single cut-off. Using these new criteria most HIV/HCV-co-infected patients can be classified and, consequently, spared of liver biopsy. Only patients with intermediate values would need invasive procedures.