954
Endothelial Activation Markers Are Linked to HIV Status and Are Independent of ART and Lipoatrophy
Allison Ross*, R Armentrout, M O'Riordan, N Storer, D El Bejjani, N Rizk, D Harrill, and G McComsey
Case Western Reserve Univ and Univ Hosp Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH, US
Background: HIV
infection carries an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Endothelial
dysfunction and chronic inflammation have been separately reported in HIV+
subjects. It is unclear whether lipoatrophy is independently associated with increased
endothelial dysfunction and higher systemic inflammation. We assessed
endothelial activation and inflammation markers in HIV+ subjects,
and their relationship with limb fat and metabolic parameters.
Methods: We enrolled 82 patients with lipoatrophy (lipo+ group)
and 50 HIV+ on ART for >2 years without lipoatrophy with HIV-1
RNA <1000 copies/mL (lipo– group), 20 HIV+ ART-naïve and
30 HIV– healthy controls. Plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)
-a, soluble
TNF receptors (sTNFRI, sTNFRII), interleukin (IL) -6, and high-sensitivity
C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured as well as levels of 3 endothelial
markers: soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular
cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), von Willebrand factor (vWF), and the established
cardiovascular marker myeloperoxidase (MPO). Fasting metabolic profile was also
measured. Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Spearman Rank correlation coefficients
were used.
Results: Of the participants, 41% were white and 72% male. Age was
similar in HIV+ naïve and HIV–, but HIV+ on
ART were older than naïve (45 vs 31 years; p <0.001). All groups had
similar body mass index. sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and vWF were higher in HIV+
naïve patients than HIV– (vWF 28.9 vs 12.1 U/mL; p = 0.003)
and to HIV+ on ART (vWF 28.9 vs 16.8 U/mL; p = 0.03), but no
difference was found between lipo+ and lipo– groups, or
between HIV+ on ART and HIV– controls. DEXA-measured limb
fat did not correlate with any endothelial marker. Plasma TNF-a, hsCRP, and IL-6 were
similar in all groups. sTNFRI and sTNFRII were similar in HIV+ naïve
vs HIV– (p = 0.89), but were lower in treated vs naïve group (sTNFRII
294 vs 600 pg/mL; p = 0.004). Lipo+ group had lower sTNFRI
and II than matched lipo– group (sTNFRII 238 vs 330 pg/mL; p =
0.02). MPO was significantly higher in HIV+ naïve than HIV–
(5590 vs 1684 pg/mL; p = 0.005), but similar in HIV+ treated and
naïve. MPO significantly correlated with sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and sTNFRII. None of
the endothelial nor inflammation markers correlated with CD4 count, lipids,
glucose, or specific ART type.
Conclusions: This study shows enhanced
endothelial activation and increased cardiovascular markers in ART-naïve, while
HIV+ on ART with HIV-1 RNA <1000 copies/mL have similar values to
HIV– of similar age. Lipoatrophy status did not influence these
findings.
|