Home Search Abstracts View Session E-mail Abstract Author


Session 126 Poster Abstracts
Clinical Pharmacology of Protease Inhibitors
Session Day and Time: Tuesday, 1-4 pm
Room: Hall A


765
Lopinavir/Ritonavir 500/125 mg Twice-daily + Efavirenz Approximate the Pharmacokinetic Exposure of LPV/r 400/100 mg Twice-daily Administered Alone in Healthy Adult Subjects
Juki Ng*, C Klein, J Xiong, Y L Chiu, T Doan, C Rolle, C Holas, R Stryker, and B Bernstein
Abbott Labs, Abbott Park, IL, US

Background:  Co-administration of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) 200/50-mg tablets at a dose of 400/100 mg or 600/150 mg twice-daily with efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg results in 13 to 20% lower or 36% higher LPV exposure, respectively, compared to LPV/r 400/100 mg twice-daily administered without EFV. A new LPV/r 100/25-mg tablet has recently been developed making possible a dose of LPV/r 500/125 mg. This study compared the LPV/r pharmacokinetic parameters of 500/125 mg twice-daily with EFV vs 400/100-mg twice-daily alone.

Methods:  For 10 days, 19 healthy HIV-negative adult subjects received LPV/r tablet 400/100 mg twice-daily (nonfasting) followed by LPV/r tablet 500/125 mg twice-daily (nonfasting) + 600 mg EFV every hour of sleep (QHS) (fasting) for 10 days. Serial blood samples were collected over the dosing interval for LPV/r concentrations on days 10 and 20. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using 90% confidence intervals. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.

Results:  LPV/r 500/125 mg twice-daily co-administered with EFV produced similar average LPV exposure compared to LPV/r 400/100 mg twice-daily dosed alone. Ritonavir exposure was modestly increased in subjects receiving LPV/r 500/125 mg. LPV exposure dosed 500/125 mg twice-daily most closely approximated exposure of LPV/r dosed alone. Adverse events were similar to those previously described for LPV/r and EFV. The majority of adverse events noted to be mild in severity. Pharmacokinetic parameters are shown in the table.

 

Test vs Reference

Pharmacokinetic Parameter

 

Relative Bioavailability

 

Central Values*

Point
Estimate

(T/R)

90% Confidence
Interval

Test (T)

Reference (R)

 

Lopinavir

LPV/r + EFV vs

LPV/r alone

Tmax (h)

4.32

4.21

--

   --

Cmax (μg/mL)

13.49

12.04

1.121

1.023 to 1.228

AUC12 (μg*h/mL)

113.16

106.80

1.060

0.956 to 1.174

C0 (μg/mL)

6.46

6.77

0.954

0.822 to 1.108

Cmin (μg/mL)

4.97

5.52

0.902

0.784 to 1.037

 

Ritonavir

LPV/r + EFV vs

LPV/r alone

Tmax (h)

4.11

4.00

--

--

Cmax (μg/mL)

1.28

1.01

1.261

1.057 to 1.504

AUC12 (μg*h/mL)

6.84

5.71

1.199

1.050 to 1.369

C0 (μg/mL)

0.25

0.23

1.113

0.910 to 1.361

Cmin (μg/mL)

0.16

0.15

1.103

0.924 to 1.315

* Geometric mean for Cmax, AUC12, C0 and Cmin; Arithmetic mean for Tmax.

 

Central Values

LPV/r BID + EFV every hour of sleep

400/100 mg
N = 17

500/125 mg
N = 19

600/150 mg
N = 23

Cmax (µg/mL)

0.869

1.121

1.356

Cmin (µg/mL)

0.585

0.902

1.320

C0 (µg/mL)

0.732

0.954

1.362

AUC12 (µg·h/mL)

0.796

1.060

1.357

Conclusions: LPV/r at a dose of 500/125 mg twice-daily co-administered with EFV approximates the pharmacokinetic exposure of LPV/r 400/100 mg twice-daily when administered alone. The regimens were well tolerated.