795
Vicriviroc in Combination Therapy with an Optimized ART Regimen for Treatment-experienced Subjects: VICTOR-E1
Barry Zingman*1, J Suleiman2, E DeJesus3, J Slim4, C Mak5, M McCarthy5, N Case5, and L Dunkle5
1Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY, US; 2Brazilmed Assistencia Medica e Pesquisa, Sao Paolo; 3Orlando Immunology Ctr, FL, US; 4St Michael`s Med Ctr, Newark, NJ, US; and 5Schering-Plough Res Inst, Kenilworth, NJ, US
Background: Vicriviroc
(VCV) is a next-generation small molecule CCR5 antagonist, administered orally once-daily,
now in worldwide phase III development for treatment of HIV. This phase II
study determined the optimal dose for Phase 3 in combination with an optimized
background antiretroviral regimen (OBT) containing a ritonavir (RTV) -boosted
protease inhibitor (PI) based on efficacy, safety and durability of
antiretroviral effect.
Methods: This was
a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial of VCV 20 or
30 mg once-daily vs placebo for 48 weeks. Eligible subjects were CCR5-tropic
HIV-infected adults who had received ≥2 prior classes of ART with
≥1000 copies/mL plasma HIV RNA despite current 3-drug ART regimen. Subjects
with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection were
allowed; prior seizure disorder or malignancy was excluded. OBT could include
any available ART, except efavirenz (EFV), including those on EAP.
Results: We
randomized 116 subjects 1:1:1 to VCV 20 mg, 30 mg, or placebo once-daily,
administered with a new OBT. Mean age was 45 years; 77% were male; 68% white,
17% black, 72% Latino. Mean plasma HIV RNA was 4.5 log10 and CD4
count was 210 cells/µL; 51% had an AIDS-defining event prior to study; 6 (5%)
were HCV co-infected. OBT included ≥2 active drugs in 43% subjects; 27
(23%) received darunavir (DRV). Of the total, 2 never received the study drug,
21 (18%) discontinued prematurely because of virologic failure (14 on placebo),
and 2 discontinued because of adverse events, neither of which was attributed
to the study drug. At 24 weeks (n =
91), mean decline in HIV RNA was –2.04, –2.04, and –0.96 log10 in
the 3 groups, respectively (p <0.001,
active vs placebo). Percentage with HIV RNA <400 copies were 75%, 72%, and
34% (p <0.01) and <50
copies were 58%, 64%, and 26% (p <0.01)
in the 3 groups, respectively. Mean CD4 counts rose 100, 94, and 56 cells/µL in
the 3 groups, respectively (p = 0.15).
No toxicities or signals of safety issues were observed.
Conclusions: VCV
at 20 mg and 30 mg once-daily demonstrated superior antiviral efficacy over
optimized ART alone. Virologic benefit was achieved even when OBT contained ≥2
to 3 active drugs; there was no geographical difference in efficacy. The most
stringent criteria of efficacy favored VCV 30 mg once-daily. No clinically
significant differences in the safety profile between VCV and placebo groups
emerged in this study including hepatotoxicity, opportunistic infections,
malignancies, or other conditions. Efficacy and safety supported 30 mg once-daily
for phase III studies; 48-week results will be available.
|