771
Influence of the Orosomucoid Polymorphism on Amprenavir Pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected Patients: ANRS104 Trial
A Barrail-Tran1, C Cosson1, G Raguin2, G Chene3, P M Girard4, and Anne-Marie Taburet*1
1Hosp Bicetre, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France; 2Croix St Simon Hosp, Paris, France; 3INSERM U593, Bordeaux, France; and 4Hosp St Antoine, Paris, France
Background: Orosomucoid (ORM) is a major binding protein for protease inhibitors
such as amprenavir (APV). The concentration and the polymorphism of ORM could
be responsible for interindividual variation in the plasma binding of APV,
which might influence the pharmacokinetics and virological efficacy of APV. The
objective was to describe the ORM polymorphism in HIV-infected patients and to
determine its possible influence on the APV pharmacokinetics.
Methods: The study was
conducted in a subgroup of 13 HIV-1-infected patients (11 males, 47 [32 to 53]
years old) included in the Puzzle 1-ANRS 104 trial and treated by ritonavir
(RTV) -boosted APV and NRTI. The phenotypes of ORM variants was determined in
sera after desialylation by isoelectric focusing on polyacrylamide gels
following by immunoblotting. ORM concentrations were assayed at week 2. APV
total (APVt) and unbound plasma concentrations (APVu) were measured at week 2
prior to drug intake (3 patients) and during the dosing interval (10 patients).
The unbound fraction was the ratio of APVu and APVt. APV total and unbound
apparent clearance (CLt/F, Clu/F) and area under the curve (AUCt, AUCu) were
determined using a non-compartmental approach. Relations between ORM
phenotypes, ORM concentrations, and APV parameters were tested using an ANOVA
test.
Results: Median ORM
concentrations were 1.0 g/L (0.4 to 1.8). Of these patients, 3 had the
phenotype ORM1*S-ORM2*A, 6 were ORM1*F1S-ORM2*A, and 4 were ORM1*F1-ORM2*A. The
allele ORM1*F2 was not observed. All patients expressed a monomorphic allele on
ORM2 locus. Median APVt and APVu were 1648 ng/mL (648 to 5353) and 152 ng/mL
(65 to 408), respectively and were not correlated to ORM concentrations or
phenotypes. ORM concentrations were not found to be significantly dependant on
ORM phenotypes. Mean APV unbound fraction was significantly higher (p = 0.037)
in patients presenting the ORM1*S-ORM2*A phenotype than the ORM1*F1S-ORM2*A or
the ORM1*F1-ORM2*A (0.12 vs 0.10 and 0.07). Consequently there was a
significant increase in mean APV Clu/F (584 L/h vs 314 and 196; p = 0.029)
and APV Clt/F (p = 0.001, 50.4 L/h vs 19.8 and 11.6) leading to a
decrease in APV AUCt (p = 0.050, 7937ng/mL·h vs 21,758 and 37,391)
without significant difference in APV AUCu.
Conclusions: The different ORM variants affect APV pharmacokinetics parameters.
This could be the consequence of different capacities for APV binding, which
suggest that the variant ORM1*S has a lower affinity for APV than the variant
ORM1*F1. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the impact on virological
efficacy.
|