548
Condom Failure Does Not Explain Increased Risk of HIV Seroconversion Seen in Uncircumcised Men Who Have Sex with Men Practicing Insertive Anal Sex
Jonathan Fuchs*1,2, E Vittinghoff2, P Kittredge1, and S Buchbinder1,2
1San Francisco Dept of Publ Hlth, CA, US and 2Univ of California, San Francisco, US
Background: Lack of circumcision and condom failure
have independently predicted risk of HIV seroconversion in different
prospective cohorts of men who have sex with men (MSM). We sought to determine
whether condom failure explains the association between lack of circumcision
and HIV risk for the insertive anal sex partner when condoms are used. For this
to be true, condom failure must be associated with both lack of circumcision
and risk for HIV seroconversion of the insertive partner.
Methods: Condom failure, defined as breakage or
slippage during insertive anal sex, was assessed by circumcision status over 18
months of follow-up among 2161 MSM in the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) -sponsored Vaccine Preparedness Study.
Results: Of included participants, 12% reported
being uncircumcised. Overall, these men reported condom failure in 1.7% of
12,021 insertive anal sex episodes, as compared to 1.5% of 74,160 among
circumcised men. Using generalized estimating equation (GEE) binomial models to
account for frequency of insertive anal sex, which was slightly higher among
uncircumcised men, risk of condom failure was similar in the 2 groups (OR 1.11,
95%CI 0.81 to 1.51). Across 5092 6-month
participant follow-up periods where at least 1 episode of protected insertive
anal sex was reported, 51 HIV
seroconversions were detected. A mean of 11.7 (range 1 to 85, total 59,648)
episodes of protected insertive anal sex
were reported in these periods, while slippage or breakage was reported in an
average of 0.16 insertive anal sex
episodes (range 0 to 10, total 857). Using pooled logistic models for
seroconversion, we found no evidence that condom slippage or breakage increased
risk of HIV infection for the insertive partner (p = 0.53). Furthermore,
controlling for slippage or breakage did not attenuate the increased risk among
uncircumcised men previously reported from this cohort.
Conclusions: Similar condom failure rates in both
circumcised and uncircumcised men, and the lack of an independent association
between condom failure and HIV seroconversion for the insertive partner,
suggest that increased condom failure neither explains nor mediates the
increased risk of HIV seroconversion observed among uncircumcised MSM
practicing insertive anal sex.
|