89LB
Immunological Characterization of Subjects from the STEP Study: A Phase IIB Test-of-Concept Trial of the MRKAd5 HIV-1 Gag/Pol/Nef Trivalent Vaccine
Michael Robertson*1, D Casimiro1, S De Rosa2, S Dubey1, L Kierstead1, and J McElrath2
1Merck Res Labs, West Point, PA, US and 2Fred Hutchinson Cancer Res Ctr, HIV Vaccine Trials Network, Seattle, WA, US
Background:
The recent phase IIB STEP trial tested the efficacy of a replication-defective
Ad5 vaccine expressing HIV-1 Gag, Pol, and Nef. We randomized 3000 HIV-1
high-risk HIV-1-uninfected volunteers (1:1) within baseline Ad5 strata to
receive 3 injections of vaccine or placebo. The interim analysis found no
evidence that vaccination prevented infection or lowered viral set-point, and a
greater incidence of infections occurred in male Ad5 seropositive vaccine than
placebo recipients. We describe laboratory investigations to explore underlying
reasons for lack of efficacy, and apparent enhanced infection rates in the Ad5
seropositive vaccinees.
Methods:
Using STEP participant pripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cryopreserved
within 8 hours of venipuncture for immunoassays, we characterized the
frequency, magnitude, and breadth of vaccine-induced T cell responses. General
immune activation and effector-memory phenotypes were assessed by
multiparameter flow cytometry.
Results:
The trivalent vaccine was highly immunogenic in the STEP trial, consistent with
observations in previous phase I studies. The vaccine-induced, anti-HIV CD8+
and CD4+ cells were polyfunctional. Potency and breadth of the
vaccine-induced responses were comparable between cases and non-cases within
Ad5 ≤200 and Ad5 >200 strata; 4 weeks after the third dose, the
circulating levels of activated (Ki67hiBcl2lo) CD4+CCR5+
cells were higher in subjects with baseline Ad5 titers >200 than in subjects
with Ad5 titers ≤200; however, within each stratum, level of activation
did not differ between vaccine and placebo recipients. Characterization of
adenovirus vector-specific T cell responses, anti-HIV T cell epitopes, virus
sequencing, and host genetic analyses are also ongoing to determine whether
these parameters will help to explain the clinical outcome.
Conclusions:
Laboratory investigations are underway to gain insight into immunological
factors that may explain in part the clinical outcomes of the STEP trial. From
data thus far, no obvious immune profile distinguishes the cases from non-cases
or appears to explain the greater infection rates in vaccinees with prior Ad5
immunity. Results from future laboratory investigations, in progress and
planned, of responses to the trans-gene and vector itself, as well as
analysis of immune activation in blood and mucosally, will have important
implications on the directions of other T cell-based vaccine development and
the HIV vaccine field in general.
|